If you've ever been through a town, you may have seen tiny 5G cell towers on the poles of street lights. They look like small boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cellular providers to your mobile.
These smaller towers are replacing larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're not as noticeable however, they could create problems for those who live nearby.
It is the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe limit at which an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The exposure limits are based upon scientific research which show that the energy of RF could be harmful to human health.
The specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the radiofrequency energy absorbed by tissue. It's typically 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram averaged over one gram of tissue.
Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies this could be able to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other directly-exposed body parts. This could lead to a wide range of potential harms, including exacerbated development of skin diseases such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Because of the potentially negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to create a general power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 based on the average over 1 cm2, and not exceeding 30 minutes for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the peak SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
If you've ever used a cell phone, you're probably aware that the safest range from the tower should be at least 400 meters. This is because the power of transmission from a cell tower increases dramatically the farther you are from it.
While it sounds like something that's good, the reality is that those living close to towers may actually be more susceptible to health problems. For example, a study from 2014 in India discovered that people who lived within 50m of cell towers had much more health problems than those who were away from the antennas.
But, what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower found that people who moved to areas that were further from cell towers experienced their symptoms improve within a couple of days. Studies have also shown that exposure to high levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancer, and other health problems.
This is due to the fact that RF radiation, which is used for wireless communication, has the ability to penetrate the human body's outer layer, the skin. safe distance to live from cell phone tower is crucial to know since the skin functions as a protective barrier against mechanical injury, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as entry of toxic substances. The skin is the biggest organ of the human body. It is accountable for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on several assumptions that are not supported by evidence from science. This includes the false assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe due to minimal absorption into body (i.e. the heating of tissues).
The assumption also ignores the deeper penetration of the ELF elements of modulated radio signals and the effects of brief bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions do not correspond with current understanding of the biological consequences of RF radiation. As such safe distance to live from cell phone tower shouldn't be considered for health protection exposure standards.
Furthermore to that, ICNIRP and FCC are limiting their maximum radiation limits for local peak SARs, based on the maximum speed of spatial absorption (psSAR) that is not a reliable dosimetric instrument for determining the level of radiation exposure. Particularly it is inconclusive when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been evaluated for RF radiation with co-exposure to other environmental agents , such as sunlight. The interactions of RF radiation with other environmental agents may produce synergistic or antagonistic results. This would result in the risk of having adverse health adverse effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could raise the chance of developing skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin diseases such as acne.