If you've ever walked through a city, you may have seen tiny mini 5G cell towers on the poles of street lights. They look like small boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cell phone providers to your phone.
They are replacing larger specially-designed cell towers. While they're not as noticeable, they still can cause problems for people.
A of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the safe distance that one can expose to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on research which show that the energy of RF could be harmful to health.
The specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the radiofrequency energy absorbed by tissue. It's typically 1.6 watts per kilogram, spread over a gram of tissue.
However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies this could be able to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other exposed body areas. safe distance from cell tower could result in various possible harms, like the development of skin diseases like dermatitis, cataracts and skin cancer.
Because of the potentially harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to set a general localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 based on the average on 1cm2, but not to exceed 30 minutes, for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the highest SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
If you've ever used a mobile phone, you probably know that the safest location from the tower is at least 400 meters. This is due to the power of the transmission of cell towers increases drastically the farther your location from the tower.
While it sounds like a good idea however, people who live close to towers might be more prone to health issues. For example, a study from 2014 in India found that residents living within 50 meters from cell towers suffered much more health problems than those living further away from the antennas.
But, what is a safe distance from a cell tower found that people who moved into areas farther away from cell towers noticed their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Studies have also demonstrated that exposure to extreme levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can cause brain tumors, cancer as well as other health issues.
This is due to the fact that RF radiation, which is used for wireless communication, has the ability to be absorbed by the body's outer layer, the skin. It is vital to be aware of this since the skin functions as a protective barrier against mechanical injury, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as entry of toxic substances. Additionally, it is the largest organ of the human body. It is responsible for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on a variety of assumptions that are not supported by scientific evidence. These include the erroneous assumption that exposures to RF radiation are safe due to minimal radiation penetration in the human body (i.e., tissue heating).
The assumption also ignores the more extensive penetration of ELF elements of modulated radio signals as well as the effects on the body of short bursts from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions do not correspond with current knowledge of the biological consequences of RF radiation, and thus they shouldn't be used for health protective exposure standards.
Additionally, what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower and FCC limit their radiation limits for local peak SARs, based on the maximum speed of spatial absorption (psSAR), which can be described as not a reliable dosimetric instrument to determine the degree of exposure to RF radiation. In particular it is inconclusive for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been tested for RF radiation that is exposed to other agents of the environment such as sunlight. Interactions of RF radiations with different agents in the environment could result in antagonistic or synergistic results. This would result in the risk of having adverse health adverse effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could raise the chance of developing skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin diseases such as acne.